Basic Ethics Essay

According to Michael Boylans book Basic ethical motive the study of ethics concerns itself with right and wrong, judgments that frame praise or blame. In the case of ethics, these judgments argon usually delegate to heap or to bodily processs (Boylan, 2009). This essay will discuss three study ethical theories, sexual abstention ethics, utilitarianism, and deontological ethics. It will also provide a individualised experience to help explain the relationship between virtue, values, and moral notions as it relates to utilitarianism. The three ethics theories discussed herein are the virtue ethics hypothesis that examines a persons character over a yearn period of time and is forgiving of an occasional mistake that is not legitimate with a persons past character. Deontological ethics or duty-based holiness is a theory based on a nonconsequentialist view of people and moral decision-making. Deontological ethics supports that actions are not justified by their consequences. Ra ther, factors opposite than serious outcomes de termine the rightness of actions (Deontological Ethics, 2014).Utilitarianism in the most basic term is based on measuring good in terms of usefulness. Utilitarianism is ofttimes defined as an effort to achieve the superlative good for the greatest number. Also this principle advocates that the ends justify the means in early(a) course if a negative action must be used to finish up a greater good then its justified (What Is Utilitarianism?, 2014). There are marked differences between the three ethics theories. Unlike deontic or action based theories of morality that focus on the actions a person performs, the virtue theory, aka character ethics focuses on helping people develop good character traits, like gentleness and generosity, The deontological ethics is grounded in the categorical autocratic, The Categorical Imperative simply declares, Act as if the maxim of thy actionwere to start out by thy will a universal law of natu re. The Categorical Imperative is very similar to the Golden Rule of Christianity, and other religions (do unto others as you would have them do unto you) (Deontological Ethics, 2014). On the other hand utilitarianism revolves around the concept that the end justifies the means. A personal example I have of utilitarianism organism practiced was when my Father was in hospice with terminal throat cancer. He staged a DNR, do not resuscitate.My family and I did not like his want but it is what he chose for himself and we all accepted his final wish. Although many olfactory modality this is not right to just let someone die without severe to help the person dying the attitude on these decisions is purely immovable by the person dying. The utilitarian approach can be self-seeking in nature because the judgments is strictly that of the person thinking of his own the true in my Fathers case his last dying wish. So depending on what kind of person you are, how you were raised, the env ironment you live in, your faith, the influences you may have from the social go around you belong to you all these factors could influence your ethics and depending on the situation on hand you may find yourself moving towards one or the other of these ethic theories. Morally or ethically, I would never let my dadaism die without making some attempt to resuscitate him but on the other hand I set aside my moral smell and my ethics to allow my Dad his last and final wish.ReferencesBoylan, M. (2009). Basic Ethics (2nd ed). Upper Saddle River, NJ Prentice Hall. Deontological Ethics. (2014, February 17). Retrieved from allaboutphilosophy .org http//www.allaboutphilosophy.org/deontological-ethics.htm What Is Utilitarianism? (2014, February 17). Retrieved from wisegeek.org http//www.wisegeek.com/what-is-utilitarianism.htm